Sex am Strand ist keine Privatsache: Daniela Cicarelli vs. YouTube

[gullinews]

Das Tauziehen um die Aufnahmen eines spanischen Paparazzi von Daniela Cicarelli und ihrem Partner haben jetzt vor einem brasilianischen Gericht ihr endgültiges Ende gefunden. Diverse User von YouTube hatten den Mitschnitt vom August letzten Jahres im Netz veröffentlicht. Das Supermodell und ihr Freund Tato Malzoni hatten versucht, Youtube wegen der peinlichen Szenen im Meerwasser des öffentlichen Strandes zu verklagen.



weiterlesen

[Ziegen Peter]

Mal abgesehen davon, dass das Vid eh langweilig ist.
Was ist denn das spannende an Sex am Strand oder Sex in der Öffentlichkeit? Irgendwo spielt doch die Gefahr erwischt zu werden mit, oder nicht?

Wenn man schon Sex am Strand hat, muss man auch damit rechnen, dass das andere Leute sehen und vielleicht auch filmen (solche soll's ja auch geben^^). Ich versteh die Aufregung nicht... Leute gibt's tssssss

[em_di]

Was ist denn das spannende an Sex am Strand oder Sex in der Öffentlichkeit? Irgendwo spielt doch die Gefahr erwischt zu werden mit, oder nicht?

Bei den meisten Leuten gehts eigentlich grad um den Kick, denke ich.

[Ghandy]

Ja, denen ging es um den Kick. Aber sich hinterher beschweren ist einfach tatsächlich ein Irrglaube...

[CCS]

Aber sich hinterher beschweren ist einfach tatsächlich ein Irrglaube...

Man kann's ja mal versuchen...vlt. wird's ja doch was...und evtl. kann man ja auch ein wenig Kohle rausschinden...ganz schön billig!

Cee ya, CCS

[Oj1]

wirklich sehr interessante geschichte
am besten finde ich das brasielanisch von yt ausgesperrt werden sollten oder yt den betreib einstellen

Spanish beach video scandal

On 17 September 2006, a sex video shot by paparazzo Miguel Temprano was broadcast on the TV show Dolce Vita on Spanish channel Telecinco, showing Daniela on a beach in Spain fondling her boyfriend, Merrill Lynch employee Renato "Tato" Malzoni and later having sex with him in the water. The next day an edited version of the paparazzi scenes from the show was uploaded as a video clip to YouTube, but deleted that same day. Even after the deletion the video was still available on various internet websites and file sharing networks. Newspapers reported that computer networks crashed at stock markets in Brazil after many users tried to send and download the video. On September 27, Malzoni and Cicarelli were granted an injunction by São Paulo state supreme court against YouTube, Globo.com and IG. However despite YouTube's efforts to withdraw the clip it continued to appear on the site under varying file names, and links to the video on sites other than YouTube turned up all over the Internet, news groups and peer to peer networks. Cicarelli sued again in December against YouTube, with the consequence that in January 2007, the Supreme Court ordered the site to find a way to permanently block the video from being uploaded on its servers, to shut down their site until such a block can be realized, or to face an order imposed upon Brazilian Internet service providers to block access to YouTube. Brasil Telecom, Telefonica and other ISPs implemented such a block, leaving all YouTube's IPs inaccessible in Brazil.

A few days later, the decision was revised, removing the original block decision, thus limiting to remove the offending copies of the video. However, Brazilian YouTube users created a website to boycott Cicarelli, refusing to support MTV and any advertised product, unless Daniela left the company.

MTV's response was quick (after receiving more than eighty thousand e-mails protesting), with a note on its website as well as regular institutional inserts on its programming, claiming that while supporting the users' manifest, it refused to acknowledge the validity of the effort, claiming it as unreasonable as the original censorship. Also, it claimed the censorship from the decision wasn't from Cicarelli, but from her boyfriend instead, going even further, stating that MTV nor Cicarelli ever prosecuted any website for any reason.

Later research from Conjur, a legal website denied these claims, which Cicarelli also failed to acknowledge on separate interviews on Jornal da Globo (TV) and Folha de São Paulo] (Newspaper). MTV stopped its institutional message on TV, and shortly after removed their original note from the website.

A parody of the video was made by the Pânico na TV, a controversial Brazilian nationwide broadcasted program by Rede TV!. Also the health secretary of the state of Rio Grande do Sul has made a parody with the goal of educate about the dengue fever, a virus which can by hosted by the Aedes aegypti, a mosquito specie found at the state, but yet not infected in that state. The agency's claims that they want to take advantage of the viral marketing.

In June 2007, a Brazilian judge dismissed Cicarelli's claims, indicating that as the sex took place in public, Cicarelli had no expectation of privacy and so acted in bad faith in trying to get the video removed as an invasion of her privacy. She was ordered to pay court costs and legal costs and R$10,000 to each defendant.

[Wandang]

haha.. sex in public is was feines, genau wegen dem kick wenn sie diesen nicht haben wollten, können sie sicher auch zuhause sich nen pool mit strandsand einrichten und ner palme.. bei deren geld , sicher kein problem aber nein sie müssen es ja annem strand machen wo mindestens 5-6 leute waren (hab ich so gesehen)... voyeure gibs immer und auch welche mit cam

sowieso, dass sex immer so peinlich ist... mensch sind das noch kinder?